According to Fiedler, is there an ideal leader that works in every situation?

Prepare for the CIMA Managing Performance (E2) Exam. Practice with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

According to Fiedler, is there an ideal leader that works in every situation?

Explanation:
The key idea is that leadership effectiveness is contingent on the situation. In Fiedler’s contingency theory, a leader’s impact isn’t universal; it depends on how well their leadership style fits the context. He argues that leaders have relatively fixed styles (task-focused or relationship-focused) and that the favorableness of the situation is determined by leader–member relations, task structure, and the leader’s power. Because different contexts require different styles, the same leader won’t be the best in every scenario. So there isn’t an ideal leader who works everywhere—the match between style and situation determines effectiveness. In practice, you’d either place leaders in environments that suit their style or adjust the situation to fit the leader.

The key idea is that leadership effectiveness is contingent on the situation. In Fiedler’s contingency theory, a leader’s impact isn’t universal; it depends on how well their leadership style fits the context. He argues that leaders have relatively fixed styles (task-focused or relationship-focused) and that the favorableness of the situation is determined by leader–member relations, task structure, and the leader’s power. Because different contexts require different styles, the same leader won’t be the best in every scenario. So there isn’t an ideal leader who works everywhere—the match between style and situation determines effectiveness. In practice, you’d either place leaders in environments that suit their style or adjust the situation to fit the leader.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy